Freeman & Mills, Inc.   consultants to counsel and management
Freeman & Mills is one of the most respected
and experienced litigation consulting firms in the US. Since its founding in 1978, the firm has assisted attorneys in developing case strategy, assessing issues of causation and liability, formulating the measurement of damages, and providing expert testimony.

Intellectual Property and Technology

F&M provides detailed analysis of complex intellectual property matters - from liability and causation issued to the determination of damages and prejudgment interest. F&M has distinguished its intellectual property practice by combining the expertise of top economic, business and accounting professionals with a wide breadth of industry experience.

F&M Capabilities
  • PhDs in economics, MBAs and experienced Big Four CPAs
  • Experienced expert witnesses
  • Experienced in analyzing entrepreneurial, new business and new product ventures
  • Experienced in high technology industries: computer hardware and software, media, entertainment, instrumentation, health care and biotechnology
  • Evaluation of the effects of competition and pricing
  • Evaluation and calculation of damages
  • Settlement evaluation analysis
  • Experienced in Alternative Dispute Resolution procedures

F&M Case Histories
  • F&M facilitated a settlement at a reasonable royalty with no lost profits in a patent infringement matter involving medical products by attributing the plaintiff's declining market share to obsolete products and production problems rather than to alleged product infringement.
  • F&M testified at trial regarding lack of evidence of price erosion or product confusion in defense of a trademark infringement damages claim, which resulted in a jury finding of no damages.
  • F&M, in a trade secrets matter, determined defendant's actions caused the diversion of plaintiff's products; F&M also determined not only profit losses but also additional costs necessary to restore the plaintiff to its competitive position.
  • F&M prepared pricing and customer base analyses for a commercial electronics product concluding that plaintiff's sales would have been limited in the defendant's market, resulting in a $25 million reduction in the claim for damages.